qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis
Skill from qdrant/skills
Install
npx skills add qdrant/skills --skill qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis
Runs the open skills CLI and installs the skill for your agent (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor …). Alternatively copy the skill folder into .claude/skills/ or upload it in Claude.ai under Settings → Skills.
As a Claude Code plugin
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-official
/plugin install qdrant@qdrant
This skill is part of the plugin “qdrant”. In Claude Code the plugin installs it together with the plugin’s other skills, commands and hooks.
What does the qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis skill do?
Description from the SKILL.md in the source repository.
Works with Qdrant
Questions about qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis
What does the qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis skill do?
Diagnoses Qdrant search quality issues. Use when someone reports 'results are bad', 'wrong results', 'not relevant results', 'missing matches', 'recall is low', 'approximate search worse than exact', 'which embedding model', 'should I fine-tune my embedding model', 'quality dropped after quantization', 'how to measure retrieval quality', 'build a golden set', 'ground truth dataset', 'how to score recall@k', or 'is my improvement real / statistically significant'. Also use when search quality degrades without obvious changes.
How do I install qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis?
In a terminal: npx skills add qdrant/skills --skill qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis. The skills CLI asks which agents to install it for. In Claude.ai you can upload the skill folder as a ZIP under Settings → Skills.
Which agents can use qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis?
Skills use the open SKILL.md format, which Claude Code, Claude.ai, the Claude API, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI and other agents support.
Is qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis safe to use?
Our automatic check found no risky patterns (piped shell scripts, hidden characters, secret access, prompt overrides). It is not a full audit – read the SKILL.md and any scripts before installing.
Which tool is qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis for?
qdrant-search-quality-diagnosis comes from the makers of Qdrant and helps your agent work with it.
More skills from qdrant/skills
Guides sliding time window scaling in Qdrant. Use when someone asks 'only recent data matters', 'how to expire old vectors', 'time-based data rotation', 'delete old data efficiently', 'social media feed search', 'news search', 'log search with retention', or 'how to keep only last N months of data'.
Guides Qdrant query volume scaling. Use when someone asks 'query returns too many results', 'scroll performance', 'large limit values', 'paginating search results', 'fetching many vectors', or 'high cardinality results'.
Guides Qdrant query throughput (QPS) scaling. Use when someone asks 'how to increase QPS', 'need more throughput', 'queries per second too low', 'batch search', 'read replicas', or 'how to handle more concurrent queries'.
Guides Qdrant vertical scaling decisions. Use when someone asks 'how to scale up a node', 'need more RAM', 'upgrade node size', 'vertical scaling', 'resize cluster', 'scale up vs scale out', or when memory/CPU is insufficient on current nodes. Also use when someone wants to avoid the complexity of horizontal scaling.
Guides Qdrant multi-tenant scaling. Use when someone asks 'how to scale tenants', 'one collection per tenant?', 'tenant isolation', 'dedicated shards', or reports tenant performance issues. Also use when multi-tenant workloads outgrow shared infrastructure.
Guides Qdrant data volume scaling decisions. Use when someone asks 'data doesn't fit on one node', 'too much data', 'need more storage', 'vertical or horizontal scaling', 'tenant scaling', 'time window rotation', or 'data growth exceeds capacity'.
Guides Qdrant query latency optimization. Use when someone asks 'search is slow', 'how to reduce latency', 'p99 is too high', 'tail latency', 'single query too slow', 'how to make search faster', or 'latency spikes'.
Diagnoses and improves Qdrant search relevance. Use when someone reports 'search results are bad', 'wrong results', 'low precision', 'low recall', 'irrelevant matches', 'missing expected results', or asks 'how to improve search quality?', 'which embedding model?', 'should I use hybrid search?', 'how to combine keyword and vector search / fusion / RRF / prefetch?', 'should I use reranking?', 'relevance feedback?', 'how to measure retrieval quality?', 'build a golden set', 'ground truth dataset', 'how to score recall@k?', 'is my improvement real / statistically significant?', or 'should I fine-tune my embedding model?'. Also use when search quality degrades after quantization, model change, or data growth.
Related skills in Research & Web
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding, narrow code-only or run-only exploration, passive repo analysis, verified novelty claims, or implicit experimentation.
Rigor Reproduce compatible skill slug for README-first deep learning repository reproduction. Use when the user wants an end-to-end, minimal-trustworthy flow that reads the repository first, selects the smallest documented inference or evaluation target, coordinates intake, setup, trusted execution, optional trusted training, optional repository analysis, and optional paper-gap resolution, enforces conservative patch rules, records evidence assumptions deviations and human decision points, and writes the standardized `repro_outputs/` bundle. Do not use for paper summary, generic environment setup, isolated repo scanning, standalone command execution, silent protocol changes, score chasing, or broad research assistance outside repository-grounded reproduction.
Rigor Train skill for deep learning research repositories. Use when a documented or selected training command should be run conservatively for startup verification, short-run verification, full kickoff, or resume, with command, config, seed, log, checkpoint, status, and metric evidence written to standardized `train_outputs/`. Do not use for environment setup, exploratory sweeps, speculative idea implementation, or end-to-end orchestration.
Rigor Improve / Rigor Explore run leaf skill for bounded exploratory evidence in deep learning research repositories. Use when the researcher explicitly authorizes exploratory runs such as small-subset validation, short-cycle guess-and-check, batch sweeps, idle-GPU search, or quick transfer-learning trials, with fair-comparison caveats and no-overclaim summaries in `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for end-to-end exploration orchestration on top of `current_research`, trusted baseline execution, conservative training verification, default routing, verified SOTA claims, or implicit experimentation.
Search, scrape, crawl, extract structured data, and monitor web pages via the ScrapeGraph AI CLI. Use when the user asks to search the web, scrape a webpage, grab content from a URL, extract JSON from a site, crawl documentation or site sections, monitor a page for changes, inspect request history, check ScrapeGraph credits, or validate API setup.
When the user wants to create sales collateral, pitch decks, one-pagers, objection handling docs, or demo scripts. Also use when the user mentions 'sales deck,' 'pitch deck,' 'one-pager,' 'leave-behind,' 'objection handling,' 'deal-specific ROI analysis,' 'demo script,' 'talk track,' 'sales playbook,' 'proposal template,' 'buyer persona card,' 'battle card,' 'battlecard,' 'competitive one-pager,' 'win-loss analysis,' 'why are we losing deals,' 'loss reasons,' 'how do I respond to this objection,' 'prospect just said,' 'help my sales team,' 'sales materials,' or 'what should I give my sales reps,' 'cold call script,' or 'voicemail script.' Use this for any document or asset that helps a sales team close deals. For public competitor comparison pages, see competitors. For running buyer interviews or churn research, see customer-research. For marketing website copy, see copywriting. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For the offer being sold (bonuses, guarantees, pricing structure), see offers.
Web search and content extraction with Tavily and Exa via inference.sh CLI. Apps: Tavily Search, Tavily Extract, Exa Search, Exa Answer, Exa Extract. Capabilities: AI-powered search, content extraction, direct answers, research. Use for: research, RAG pipelines, fact-checking, content aggregation, agents. Triggers: web search, tavily, exa, search api, content extraction, research, internet search, ai search, search assistant, web scraping, rag, perplexity alternative
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," "PMF survey," "product/market fit survey," "customer interview questions," "interview outreach," "Sales Safari," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for analyzing existing research assets, mining online sources, AND running primary research (interviews and surveys). For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.