Skills for “review”

Compressed code review - one line per finding with location, problem and fix. Use for /caveman-review, "review this PR", or "review the diff".

Performs a lightweight pre-release readiness review of Atlassian Forge apps across manifest/module wiring, architecture, runtime compatibility, dependency posture, tests, deploy readiness, and obvious security, cost, or…

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating…

Adversarially review the full relevant PR diff with isolated probes and meaningful before/after checks. Use for "review the PR", "sandbox review", or the review stage; retain required reviewer independence and report…

…gate via second model. Spawn a different AI model to review work before committing. Includes refusal routing: if one model refuses, switch silently to the next. Extended in v0.25.1 with structured review-mode…

Performs a white-box security review of Atlassian Forge apps using structured, Forge-specific security rules and evidence-driven reporting. Use when the user asks for a Forge security review, security audit, vuln…

Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce…

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind…

Read-only review of Caveman Cloud evidence: cost, Cave Score, workflows, traces, latency, errors, routing, savings. Use when asked what Caveman found or where LLM spend goes.

Close out a review/meta branch that lands an evidence-ingest / curation batch: create the named nodes, ingest verified evidence, appraise Trust Magnitude, calibrate stars, wire suites, correct upstream naming, stage…

Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes — Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating…

Perform a read-only, defect-first review of a specified code change and return every actionable finding. Use when another agent delegates review of uncommitted changes, a base-branch diff, a commit, or custom review…

Reviews a saved portfolio, household or model with Advisor Center analytics in three sections rendered inline in the chat — portfolio snapshot, stress scenarios, then opportunities, fund health and Funds to Explore —…

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

Review code changes by collecting the review target, researching context, checking risks, and reporting findings before summary.

Review a Gaia curation PR or branch as a read-only merge gate. Use for canonical registry promotion, schema, evidence, prerequisite, nomenclature, installability, and generated-artifact checks. Route intake batches to…

Use this when reviewing AEM Edge Delivery Services (EDS, Franklin, Helix) code, either self-review at the end of development before opening a PR, or reviewing an existing pull request. Validates block structure, CSS and…

Review Zscaler Microsegmentation (ZMS) tag classification, application discovery, and tag-to-resource-group mapping. Investigates tag namespaces (CUSTOM, EXTERNAL, ML), tag keys and values, application catalog entries,…

…conversions via `infa2aidp cli review generate|import`. Use after infa-migrate-mapping, before trusting any generated notebook, to surface every low-confidence conversion and REVIEW REQUIRED…